The Splash- Sebanyak 50 program kerja berhasil dirancang pengurus HMJ Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris (PBI) periode 2012-2013 dalam Rapat Kerja (Raker) hari ini (26/2). Rapat yang berlangsung hampir sehari penuh itu bertempat di Gedung Seminar Undiksha, Kampus Tengah. Raker berlangsung dengan format sidang dengan dihadiri seluruh pengurus HMJ dan kordinator tingkat dilingkungan jurusan PBI.
Raker dibuka secara resmi oleh pembimbing kemahasiswaan jurusan PBI, I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra, S.Pd, M.Pd. sekitar pukul 8. 30. Sebelum pembahasan proker pada sidang pleno III, sidang didahului oleh 2 sidang pleno lainnya. Sidang pleno I yaitu sidang pembacaan susunan acara, tata tertib sidang dan pengurus HMJ PBI periode 2012-2013. Sementara sidang pleno II merupakan sidang pembacaan garis besar program kerja (GBPK) HMJ PBI.
Sidang pleno III yang merupakan inti dr sidang raker ini berjalan sangat alot. Pembahasan program kerja tiap bidang memakan waktu lebih dari 1 jam. Pro dan kontra bermunculan dari peserta sidang. Bahkan saking lamanya, sidang harus ditunda untuk istirahat makan siang. Setelah istirahat, suasana sidang tidak berubah. Masukan demi masukan dari peserta sidang dan termasuk peninjau, Bapak Pasek masih mengalir untuk kebaikan program selama setahun kedepan. Pada akhirnya presidium sidang yang sekaligus ketua HMJ, Indah Partami, mengesahkan sebanyak 50 program kerja dalam sidang paripurna III.
Dari 50 program kerja tersebut, sebagian program masih merupakan program-program dari kepengurusan sebelumnya, beberapa program lama yang di revisi dan beberapa program-program baru. Diantara program-program baru, satu diantaranya merupakan program unggulan Ketua dan wakil ketua HMJ saat suksesi lalu yaitu English Week. Berikut daftar program kerja baru yang disahkan sidang:
- Pelatihan Kepemimpinan (PK) untuk pengurus HMJ dan perwakilan kelas,
- Information Center untuk pusat informasi Mahasiswa PBI di lingkungan kampus/ruang belajar,
- Adanya Subbidang Lomba sebagai pencari dan penyebar informasi-informasi perlombaan dan kejuaraan kejuaraan.
Indah Partami berharap 50 program kerja ini dapat dilaksanakan dengan maksimal dan berharap juga dukungan dari seluruh mahasiswa dan dosen jurusan PBI untuk mensukseskannya. Semoga Hidup Berbahagia. :-)
(Arik)
Raker HMJ PBI periode 2012-2013 hasilkan 50 program kerja
Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.4
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ENGLISH ACROSS CULTURE (ICEAC) 2011
Lanjutkan!!!
Suksesnya pelaksanaan International Conference of English Across Culture (ICEAC) mendapat sanjungan dari berbagai pihak. Konferensi yang berlangsung selama dua hari tersebut dianggap sebagai langkah awal yang pantas untuk dilanjutkan pelaksanaannya. Hal ini diungkapkan sebagian besar pihak yang terlibat di dalam konferensi ini.
Ditemui Tim Warta Undiksha pada saat copy break, Itje Chodidjah mendukung keberlanjutan konferensi ini ditahun-tahun mendatang. Itje, yang merupakan satu dari lima keynote speaker dalam konferensi ini, merasa sangat terkesan dengan pelaksanaan komferensi ini. “Panitia, LO dan semua pihak yang mendukung telah bekerja keras untuk menyelenggarakan konferensi ini dan hasilnya sangat bagus dan sangat pantas untuk diberi apresiasi yang tinggi” imbuh beliau. Selain itu, menurut beliau konferensi ini mampu membantu meningkatkan kualitas guru, terutama guru bahasa Inggris di Indonesia. Dengan adanya konferensi ini, para guru-guru memperoleh kesempatan untuk berbagi dengan guru-guru bahasa Inggris dari kebudayaan berbeda sehingga dapat meningkatkan kualitas mereka sebagai seorang pendidik.
Opini yang sama datang dari salah satu peserta asing, Rowena Nuera. Dosen dari University of South Eastern Philippines ini menganggap konferensi telah diselenggarakan dengan baik. Beliau sudah sempat menghadiri beberapa konferensi sejenis dan menganggap konferensi ini sudah sesukses konferensi-konferensi sejenis lainnya yang diselenggarakan di negara lainnya. Ini merupakan sebuah pencapaian yang sangat hebat yang dapat menstimulasi panitia untuk melanjutkan penyelenggaraan konferensi ditahun-tahun berikutnya.
Konferensi pertama ini tentu bukan tanpa kekurangan. Untuk menyelenggarakan konferensi ditahun-tahun berikutnya, saran dan kritik juga datang dari berbagai pihak. Salah satu peserta konferensi dari Undiksha program Pascasarjana Kampus Denpasar, Dewi Somidiatri, menilai panitia masih kurang siap dalam mengantisipasi berbagai macam masalah yang timbul selama konferensi berlangsung. Akan tetapi, hal ini dapat dimaklumi Dewi pasalnya konferensi ini merupakan yang pertamakalinya dilaksanakan di Undiksha. Kedepannya, Dewi mengharapkan masalah-masalah seperti perubahan jadwal pembicara yang tertera di buku petunjuk agar mampu ditanggulangi pada pelaksanaan konferensi selanjutnya. Hal ini terkait pembatalan beberapa pembicara secara sepihak yang menyebabkan perubahan jadwal presentasi di tiap-tiap ruangan. Hal ini cukup mengesalkan pasalnya peserta sudah siap mendengarkan presentasi tapi ternyata presenter tidak bisa hadir. Selain itu, Dewi juga mengkritisi masalah kualitas presenter. Menurutnya, kualitas presenter masih perlu ditingkatkan sebab level dari konferensi ini sudah mencapai level internasional.Sependapat dengan Dewi, Ruwena juga merasa ada beberapa hal yang perlu ditingkatkan untuk penyelenggaraan konferensi-konferensi selanjutnya. Menurut pendapat beliau, pengorganisasian tempat dan ruangan masih bermasalah. Meskipun beliau menyukai sistem paralelisme yang diterapkan panitia, akan tetapi beliau merasa agak lelah untuk pindah ke kampus bawah kemudian kembali lagi ke kampus tengah. Hal ini jauh berbeda dari konferensi-konferensi yang pernah beliau ikuti dimana pelaksanaan konferensi terpusat di satu gedung. Sebagai informasi, ICEAC I ini dilaksanakan pada tanggal 26-27 Oktober 2011 di tiga tempat, yaitu: Ruang Auditorium Pascasarjana, Ruang Seminar Undiksha, dan Kampus Bawah Undiksha.
Saran dan kritik dari berbagai pihak tersebut sebaiknya bukan dijadikan sebagai hambatan untuk menyelenggarakan kembali konferensi ini di tahun-tahun mendatang. Sebaliknya, saran dan kritik ini diharapkan mampu menstimulasi panitia untuk menyelenggarakan konferensi yang lebih baik lagi. (Arik Budiarsana)
Mind Mapping
I Putu Arik Budiarsana
serindingindah@gmail.com
serindingindah@gmail.com
Before the writer turns to write his paper, he must be in the brainstorming stage where he is supposed to generate ideas that will be developed further in his writing. What do you want your writing look like? How to develop the ideas? Those ideas might be encountered by the writer before he turns to pour his ideas into writing. To develop ideas well, the writer needs techniques rather than just listing the ideas that want to be developed.
Many techniques can be used to develop ideas. One of the techniques is by mind mapping the ideas. Mendoza (2010) defines mind mapping as a form of “creative note taking” that is used map out the ideas in a similar way of how human’s brain processes them. Earlier than Mendoza, Jones (2009) has actually argued that through mind mapping, a general interest will be focused and branched off into the specifics of that interest. Once being finished mapping the idea, the diagram of mind map will give a visual of different ideas that are the sub parts of a larger key idea. Fleming (n.d.) concludes that in the process of writing, mind map can be made use during brainstorming.
Mind mapping is very advantageous since it enables the writer to observe the relationship between ideas, and to ease him to classify certain ideas together as they proceed. Mind maps work well during the production of ideas, and make the task livelier and more enjoyable (Steele, 2005). In addition, mind map can also activate the right brain. Mind mapping apparently encourages right-brain thinking such as stream-of-consciousness, symbolic, ‘big picture’ oriented. It is better than lying out the ideas in a linear way, for example arranging concepts in a structured method, since the linear way leads our brain to be limited to the left-brain that is logical, ordered, and detail-ordered (Joy, 2011).
To use mind map, first of all, think the topic over and look for possible sub ideas and branches from the main topic. Afterwards, write what was thought onto a paper. Once being able to get some relationships connected, re-examining the relationship between ideas is considered important to avoid misconnection. Discussing it to other people can make the mind map grow with the increased input of new ideas (Mind Mapping Software Reviews, n.d.).
Steele (2005) adds that before the mind map is ready to be turned into writing, it is important to organize first the mind map. Organizing the mind map into a linear format eases the writer to decide the best way to present their points. The writer should first think about the overall structure such as the order in which to relay the information, and then focus on the precise function each paragraph will have in their final text, as this helps to clarify their writing.
Mind mapping is very advantageous since it enables the writer to observe the relationship between ideas, and to ease him to classify certain ideas together as they proceed. Mind maps work well during the production of ideas, and make the task livelier and more enjoyable (Steele, 2005). In addition, mind map can also activate the right brain. Mind mapping apparently encourages right-brain thinking such as stream-of-consciousness, symbolic, ‘big picture’ oriented. It is better than lying out the ideas in a linear way, for example arranging concepts in a structured method, since the linear way leads our brain to be limited to the left-brain that is logical, ordered, and detail-ordered (Joy, 2011).
To use mind map, first of all, think the topic over and look for possible sub ideas and branches from the main topic. Afterwards, write what was thought onto a paper. Once being able to get some relationships connected, re-examining the relationship between ideas is considered important to avoid misconnection. Discussing it to other people can make the mind map grow with the increased input of new ideas (Mind Mapping Software Reviews, n.d.).
Steele (2005) adds that before the mind map is ready to be turned into writing, it is important to organize first the mind map. Organizing the mind map into a linear format eases the writer to decide the best way to present their points. The writer should first think about the overall structure such as the order in which to relay the information, and then focus on the precise function each paragraph will have in their final text, as this helps to clarify their writing.
References
Fleming, G. (n.d.). Brainstorming Techniques. Retrieved December 4, 2011, from About.com: http://homeworktips.about.com/od/homeworkhelp/a/brainstorming.htm
Jones, S. (2009). Mind Maps – Brainstorming Tool for Ideas and Topic Focus. Retrieved December 3, 2011, from Spunky Jones SEO Blog: http://www.spunkyjones.com/mind-maps-brainstorming-tool-ideas-topic/
Joy, L. A. (2011). 5 Different Ways Writers Can Use Mind Mapping. Retrieved December 4,
2011, from Writing Thoughts: http://www.writingthoughts.com/?p=1188
Mendoza, M. (2010). Mind Mapping: Turning Ideas Into Content. Retrieved December 3, 2011, from PC Media: http://www.davidrisley.com/mind-mapping-turning-ideas-into-content/
Mind Mapping Software Reviews. (n.d.). Retrieved December 3, 2011, from Graphics.org: http://www.graphic.org/mind-mapping-software/
Photos: The Old Kampus Bawah
Here are some photos of kampus bawah which were taken before the deconstruction.
1. The main entrance
2. The other entrance
3. The front face
4. The front face of Lobby
5. Open stage from the left side
6. Audio Lab & TU room
7. Friends from Arts Department
8. Go Inside and find the I-MHERE room
9. Hall 62.1
10. Hall 62.2
11. Hall 62.3
12. Kandang Ayam
13. Lecturers' rooms
14. Multimedia room
15. Pohon Kamboja yang amat rindang
16. Room 5A
17. Security post
All of these buildings or rooms saves many sweet memories which could not be found elsewhere.
A VISIT TO “CHILDREN HOUSE”: TEACHING IS NOT EASY AT ALL
I Putu Arik Budiarsana
serindingindah@gmail.com
This Monday, we were so lucky to get a chance to have a visit to Children Houseat Jimbaran. It is a pre-school which offers English as the main and the only communication medium used in the classroom. We had a very rare chance to have a look at activities both in the classroom and outside the classroom, to observe the classroom materials, to get known of the lesson plan and syllabus, and also to have a discussion with the teachers.
The activities arranged both in the classroom and outside the classroom are found so different from the activities conducted in the other pre-schools, especially the state ones. The teaching-learning process is conducted using the syllabus that the teachers and staffs themselves develop.So, it has a little possibility to be similar as other school. The syllabus, lesson plan, and the activities are developed on the purpose of nurturing children’s nature. The nature or the environment becomes the main concern of the schools. Children are persuaded to respect and save the nature throughout the activities planned by the school staffs.
To be effective in nurturing children’s nature, the children are taught with two teachers who each of them should play different roles in the classroom. One should teach the materials and another should maintain the behavior of the children. The purpose of the teacher assistant during the teaching and learning is to avoid the teaching-learning disruption. Take for example when there is a child crying. To avoid other children for being bothered, the teacher assistant will try to make that child calm and avoid the spread to the other children.
Furthermore, in nurturing children, the school and the teachers always keep contacting the parents. It is for the better development of the children since the children are not only at schools for the whole day. Parents are expected to know what the children’s development at school. Teachers usually keep reporting the children’s lack and try to solve it together. The school usually provides a parent-teacher meeting to talk about it at the end of each semester. Parents are usually very helpful to improve the children’s achievement.
From theinformation above, I think being teacher, if it is done seriously, is not easy as I think before.Besides transferring knowledge, the teacher should be able to communicate well with the parents. The teacher should record the children’s development and report it in the certain time that is agreed.
Teacher needs also to concern on how the children are nurtured, to persuade the children to be aware of the nature and environment. Teacher must be carefully aware with the activities conducted. Mistakes are likely to emerge in threating the students’ attitude towards the safe nature and environment. I clarify this by illustrating the example of mistake that I got from the discussion in the Children House. To celebrate the independence day of Indonesia, one dayin August, the schools held a competition of ell trolling. The game is a sort of game that is very well-known within the children since it is common to be done somewhere within the society. However, an E-mail came from a parent who complained the competition. It is since the parent was so difficult explaining the competition in which the children thought it was cruel. The game ignored the feeling of the eel which the children made fun during the competition. Thus, the teacher should plan the activity carefully in the adjustment with the mission of the school themselves; it is to develop the students’ nature and to keep the nature or environment.
Furthermore, in nurturing children, the school and the teachers always keep contacting the parents. It is for the better development of the children since the children are not only at schools for the whole day. Parents are expected to know what the children’s development at school. Teachers usually keep reporting the children’s lack and try to solve it together. The school usually provides a parent-teacher meeting to talk about it at the end of each semester. Parents are usually very helpful to improve the children’s achievement.
From theinformation above, I think being teacher, if it is done seriously, is not easy as I think before.Besides transferring knowledge, the teacher should be able to communicate well with the parents. The teacher should record the children’s development and report it in the certain time that is agreed.
Teacher needs also to concern on how the children are nurtured, to persuade the children to be aware of the nature and environment. Teacher must be carefully aware with the activities conducted. Mistakes are likely to emerge in threating the students’ attitude towards the safe nature and environment. I clarify this by illustrating the example of mistake that I got from the discussion in the Children House. To celebrate the independence day of Indonesia, one dayin August, the schools held a competition of ell trolling. The game is a sort of game that is very well-known within the children since it is common to be done somewhere within the society. However, an E-mail came from a parent who complained the competition. It is since the parent was so difficult explaining the competition in which the children thought it was cruel. The game ignored the feeling of the eel which the children made fun during the competition. Thus, the teacher should plan the activity carefully in the adjustment with the mission of the school themselves; it is to develop the students’ nature and to keep the nature or environment.
ICEAC I 2011: A GOOD STARTING POINT TO BE CONTINUED
Singaraja-Bali: The First International Conference “English across Culture” was successfully held at October, 20 and 21, 2011 in Undiksha. All designed agendas were fully well-held. The two-day conference has been appreciated by the participants and also the keynotes speakers.
This first move is considered as a positive move that should be continued subsequently. This was said by Itje Chodidjah, one of the keynote speakers, who was invited by the committee. Itche, who is a teacher counselor and trainer, got good impressions of the organization of the conference. She suggested the committees to continue the organization of this conference because it is very good to help improving Indonesia teachers, especially English teachers.
The same opinion comes from Rowena Nuera. She, who is a lecturer of University of South Eastern Philippines, said that the conference was held very greatly. She had attended many similar conferences and she felt that ICEAC could be considered as successful as other conferences in other countries. It was actually a very good achievement that should stimulate the committees to keep holding the conference in the following years.
The conference, however, did not fully please all the participants. Critics cannot be denied to pop up. One of the local participants from Undiksha S2, Dewi Somidiatri, suggested the committees to have a fix schedule in the guidance book and announced the changes clearly. It was related to the cancelation of some speakers who did not inform that they were not there presenting their paper. She also felt necessary to improve the quality of the speakers since the level of the conference was adorably international.
Ruwena strengthened the opinion of Dewi. She felt that the organization of the room was a bit problematic. Though she liked the parallelism of the room, she felt so tired to move from Kampus Tengah to Kampus Bawah and then went back to Kampus Tengah. It was not like she got in the other conferences she attended.
The weakness of this year conference should not break the enthusiasm of the committees to hold the conference in the following years. It was the first time for the committees to hold it. But now, they can learn from those weaknesses to hold the next better conference. (Arik)
The same opinion comes from Rowena Nuera. She, who is a lecturer of University of South Eastern Philippines, said that the conference was held very greatly. She had attended many similar conferences and she felt that ICEAC could be considered as successful as other conferences in other countries. It was actually a very good achievement that should stimulate the committees to keep holding the conference in the following years.
The conference, however, did not fully please all the participants. Critics cannot be denied to pop up. One of the local participants from Undiksha S2, Dewi Somidiatri, suggested the committees to have a fix schedule in the guidance book and announced the changes clearly. It was related to the cancelation of some speakers who did not inform that they were not there presenting their paper. She also felt necessary to improve the quality of the speakers since the level of the conference was adorably international.
Ruwena strengthened the opinion of Dewi. She felt that the organization of the room was a bit problematic. Though she liked the parallelism of the room, she felt so tired to move from Kampus Tengah to Kampus Bawah and then went back to Kampus Tengah. It was not like she got in the other conferences she attended.
The weakness of this year conference should not break the enthusiasm of the committees to hold the conference in the following years. It was the first time for the committees to hold it. But now, they can learn from those weaknesses to hold the next better conference. (Arik)
DEKAN JANJI PENUHI FASILITAS BELAJAR DESEMBER 2011
Singaraja: Dekan Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Prof. Dr. Putu Kerti Nitiasih, M.A, berjanji untuk memenuhi fasilitas belajar menagajar di kampus bawah pada bulan Desember ini. Hal ini disampaikan beliau dalam audiensi, senin (3/10) kemarin, antara pihak dekanat dan pemimpin fungsionaris mahasiswa di lingkungan FBS.
Ibu dekan, dalam kesempatan itu, meminta permakluman seluruh mahasiswa dan dosen di lingkungan FBS atas kekurangan fasilitas belajar mengajar tersebut. Menurut beliau, gedung baru ini sebetulnya masih belum seratus persen rampung. Ditambahkan beliau, sebenarnya antara pihak kontraktor dan universitas belum ada proses serah terima. Fasilitas baru dapat dipenuhi setelah kontraktor menyelesaikan gedung D yang masih dibangun saat ini. Disamping itu pula, pemenuhan fasilitas ini masih harus menunggu anggaran selanjutnya. Oleh karena itu, Ibu dekan meminta seluruh mahasiswa dan dosen untuk lebih bersabar.
Seperti diketahui, gedung kuliah kampus bawah merupakan gedung hasil renovasi dan gedung baru yang dikerjakan sejak satu tahun yang lalu. Fasilitas masih sangat kurang di dalam gedung; Belum tersedianya LCD, AC, dan tempat sampah di setiap ruangan; Kursi yang masih jauh sedikit dibandingkan jumlah mahasiswa; Papan tulis tidak tersedia di semua ruangan. Hal yang paling mengganggu adalah suara keributan para kontraktor yang sedang membangun gedung D.
Dalam audiensi kemarin, Ibu dekan juga menghimbau seluruh civitas akademika FBS untuk bersama-sama merawat gedung yang baru ini. Beliau mengajak mahasiswa untuk menumbuhkan sebuah kebudayaan baru yaitu budaya disiplin seperti membuang sampah pada tempatnya, memarkir sepeda motor dengan benar dan rapi, berpenampilan sesuai dengan etika yang tersedia di buku pedoman, dan sikap disiplin lainnya. Beliau mengecam sekali tindakan tindakan bodoh mahasiswa yang tidak mencerminkan kedewasaan mahasiswa. Hal ini terkait temuan bapak PR I yang mendapati banyak jejak sepatu yang dengan sengaja di ‘ukir’ di dinding tembok. (Arik)
Seperti diketahui, gedung kuliah kampus bawah merupakan gedung hasil renovasi dan gedung baru yang dikerjakan sejak satu tahun yang lalu. Fasilitas masih sangat kurang di dalam gedung; Belum tersedianya LCD, AC, dan tempat sampah di setiap ruangan; Kursi yang masih jauh sedikit dibandingkan jumlah mahasiswa; Papan tulis tidak tersedia di semua ruangan. Hal yang paling mengganggu adalah suara keributan para kontraktor yang sedang membangun gedung D.
Dalam audiensi kemarin, Ibu dekan juga menghimbau seluruh civitas akademika FBS untuk bersama-sama merawat gedung yang baru ini. Beliau mengajak mahasiswa untuk menumbuhkan sebuah kebudayaan baru yaitu budaya disiplin seperti membuang sampah pada tempatnya, memarkir sepeda motor dengan benar dan rapi, berpenampilan sesuai dengan etika yang tersedia di buku pedoman, dan sikap disiplin lainnya. Beliau mengecam sekali tindakan tindakan bodoh mahasiswa yang tidak mencerminkan kedewasaan mahasiswa. Hal ini terkait temuan bapak PR I yang mendapati banyak jejak sepatu yang dengan sengaja di ‘ukir’ di dinding tembok. (Arik)
ALUR PENDAFTARAN NATIONAL ENGLISH OLIMPIAD RAYON BALI
1. AMBIL FORMULIR DI:
- SEKOLAHMU
- DISINI
- www.englishmonth9.blogspot.com
2. BAYAR DI BANK:
BANK MANDIRI, 144-00-1216810-7 ATAS NAMA DHEVY NURDHIATI W.
SEBESAR RP 125,000.00
*SIMPAN BUKTI PEMBAYARAN
3. REGISTRASI ONLINE:
KIRIM E-MAIL DENGAN FORMAT:
Subject : REGISTRASI PESERTA NEO 2011 RAYON BALI
To : registrasi_bali_neo@yahoo.com
Cc : registrasi_neo@yahoo.com
Isi : RAYON BALI_NOMER TRANSAKSI BANK_ NAMA LENGKAP PESERTA_ASAL SEKOLAH
4. REGISTRASI ULANG:
Di Kampus Undiksha pada tanggal 15 Oktober 2011, hari H, dengan membawa:
- Formulir pendaftaran
- Fotokopi kartu pelajar sebanyak 2 lembar
- Foto 3X4 sebanyak 2 lembar
- Fotokopi bukti pembayaran dari bank Mandiri.
5. CHECKING:
Lihat di www.englishmonth9.blogspot.com untuk mengecek apakan sudah terdaftar atau belum.
NATIONAL ENGLISH OLYMPIAD: RAYON BALI
NATIONAL ENGLISH OLYMPIAD
Rayon Bali
A. GAMBARAN SINGKAT
Penyelenggara : Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Rayon Bali : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha): HMJ Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Tanggal Pelaksanaan : 15 Oktober 2011
Tempat Pelaksanaan : Kampus Undiksha
Pendaftaran : 16 Agustus-13 Oktober 2011
Biaya Pendaptaran : Rp 125,000.00 (Pendaftaran Online)
B. DESKRIPSI KEGIATAN
National English Olympiad 2011 ini merupakan sebuah kompetisi akademis antar pelajar SMA/SMK/sederajat untuk menghasilkan seorang pelajar memiliki kualitas pemahaman dan kemampuan dalam bidang ilmu bahasa Inggris. Kegiatan ini akan memperebutkan Piala Menteri Pendidikan Nasional, Piala Gubernur Jatim, Piala Walikota Malang, Piala Rektor Universitas Negeri Malang, piala Dekan Fakultas Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang, dan piala Ketua Jurusan Sastra Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang. Untuk di Bali, UM bekerja sama dengan Undiksha untuk menyelenggarakan babak penyisishan.
C. PETUNJUK PELAKSANAAN
C.1. PESERTA
1. Peserta adalah pelajar SMA/MA/SMK sederajat diseluruh Indonesia.
2. Mendaptarkan diri ke Panitia National English Olympiad 2011 berdasarkan aturan yang telah ditetapkan. Alur pendaptaran bisa diunduh disini.
3. Peserta tidak diperbolehkan mengikuti National English Olympiad 2011 lebih dari satu rayon.
4. Masing-masing sekolah dapat mengirimkan peserta sebanyak-banyaknya.
5. Peserta wajib melihat informasi National English Olympiad 2011 di www.englishmonth9.blogspot.com
6. peserta yang sudah mendaftar atas namanya tidak dapat di gantikan dengan orang lain.
7. Apabila pada hari H pesrta tidak hadir, makapesrta dianggap gugur dan biaya pendaftaran tidak dapat ditarik.
8. Kartu tanda peserta akan diberikan pada saat registrasi ulang tanggal 15 Oktober 2011.
9. Peserta wajib memakai seragam sekolah dan bersepatu.
10. Setiap peserta wajib membawa dan memakai pensil 2B beserta karet penghapus.
11. Hal-hal lain akan dijelaskan pada saat Technical Meeting sebelum lomba dimulai.
12. seorang guru pendamping akan mendapatkan sertifikat apabila mendampingi minimal 5 peserta.
C.2 PENDAFTARAN
1. Pendaftaran dimulai tanggal 16 Agustus 2011 dan ditutup tanggal 13 Oktober 2011.
2. Setiap peserta wajib mendaftarkan diri dan membayar uang pendaftaran sebesar Rp 125,000.00/ orang khusus rayon Bali, Jambi dan Kalimantan.
3. Formulir pendaftaran dapat diperoleh di sekolah masing-masing atau diunduh disini.
4. Adapun alur pendaftaran adalah sebagai berikut:
a. Peserta mengambil kemudian mengisi formulir pendaftaran yang dapat diperoleh disekolah masing-masing atau download disini.
b. Setelah mengembalikan formulir, peserta National English Olympiad dapat membayar biaya pendaftaran ke nomor rekening Bank Mandiri 144-00-1216810-7 atas nama Dhevy Nurdhiati W. (untuk bukti pendaftaran dari Bank dimohonkan untuk disimpan untuk keperluan pendaftaran secara online dan daftar ulang)
c. Setelah mendapat nomor transaksi dari bank, peserta harus melakukan pendaftaran online (E-Mail) sebagai berikut:
• Mengirimkan data diri dengan mengisi:
Subject : REGISTRASI PESERTA NEO 2011 RAYON BALI
To : registrasi_bali_neo@yahoo.com
CC : registrasi_neo@yahoo.com
• Adapun format isinya adalah sebagai berikut:
RAYON BALI_NOMER TRANSAKSI_NAMA LENGKAP PESERTA_ASAL SEKOLAH
5. Peserta atau perwakilan dari setiap sekolah yang tidak melakuakan registrasi ulang pada hari H dianggap mengundurkan diri dan biaya tidak dapat ditarik kembali.
ALUR PENDAFTARAN NATIONAL ENGLISH ILYNPIAD RAYON BALI
1. AMBIL FORMULIR DI:
- SEKOLAHMU
- DISINI
- www.englishmonth9.blogspot.com
2. BAYAR DI BANK:
BANK MANDIRI, 144-00-1216810-7 ATAS NAMA DHEVY NURDHIATI W.
SEBESAR RP 125,000.00
*SIMPAN BUKTI PEMBAYARAN
3. REGISTRASI ONLINE:
KIRIM E-MAIL DENGAN FORMAT:
Subject : REGISTRASI PESERTA NEO 2011 RAYON BALI
To : registrasi_bali_neo@yahoo.com
Cc : registrasi_neo@yahoo.com
Isi : RAYON BALI_NOMER TRANSAKSI BANK_ NAMA LENGKAP PESERTA_ASAL SEKOLAH
4. REGISTRASI ULANG:
Di Kampus Undiksha pada tanggal 15 Oktober 2011, hari H, dengan membawa:
- Formulir pendaftaran
- Fotokopi kartu pelajar sebanyak 2 lembar
- Foto 3X4 sebanyak 2 lembar
- Fotokopi bukti pembayaran dari bank Mandiri.
5. CHECKING:
Lihat di www.englishmonth9.blogspot.com untuk mengecek apakan sudah terdaftar atau belum.
C.3 METODA PELAKSAKSANAAN
1. Babak Penyisihan (Di Singaraja, Bali)
Babak penyisihan dilaksanakan dengan tes tulis dan dalam waktu yang bersamaandengan rayon lainnya, yang terdiri dari dua seleksi, yaitu:
a. Preliminary 1
b. Preliminary 2
2. Babak Quarterfinal (Di Malang, UM)
Babak ini diikuti oleh seluruh peserta yang lolos pada babak penyisihan tiap rayon.
3. Babak Semifinal (Di Malang, UM)
Babak semifinal diikuti oleh 50% dari peserta yang lolos pada babak quarterfinal.
4. Babak Final (Di Malang, UM)
Babak final diikuti oleh 6 peserta yang lolos pada babak semifinal.
C.4 SUSUNAN ACARA
Rundown Preliminary Rounds Sabtu, 15 Oktober 2011
NO WAKTU (WITA) ACARA
1 07.00-08.00 Daftar Ulang
2 08.00-08.30 Opening Ceremony
3 08.30-09.00 Technical Meeting Preliminary 1
4 09.00-11.00 Preliminary 1
5. 11.00-13.00 Istirahat
6. 13.00-13.30 Technical Meeting Preliminary 2
7 13.30-15.00 Preliminary 2
8. 15.00-15.30 Pengumunan Pemenang
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Total Pageviews
Follow Us on Facebook
The Sophomore. Powered by Blogger.
Blogroll
Popular Posts
Labels
Berita
(28)
Download
(5)
Education
(1)
Header
(1)
HMJ
(23)
Lecture Project
(4)
OPINI
(5)
others
(1)
Pengumuman
(11)
Pengurus HMJ
(1)
Photos
(13)
Psychological Articles
(4)
Spongebob
(3)
Story
(1)
Tips
(1)